I had this kinda crazy idea of doing pythagorean flash calculator of Red Sox, Yankes and Rays for boston.com. According pythagorean expectation, a baseball team’s winning percentage is 1 divided by 1 plus runs allowed divided by runs scored square. 
but for it to make sense, the 2008 numbers has to come pretty close to the actual numbers. So here is your 2008 numbers.
| American League 2008 |
| East |
W |
L |
PCT |
RS |
RA |
PYTH W% |
PYTH W |
PYTH L |
Off by: |
| y–Tampa Bay |
97 |
65 |
.599 |
774 |
671 |
.571 |
92 |
70 |
-5 |
| w–Boston |
95 |
67 |
.586 |
845 |
694 |
.597 |
97 |
65 |
2 |
| New York |
89 |
73 |
.549 |
789 |
727 |
.541 |
88 |
74 |
-1 |
| Toronto |
86 |
76 |
.531 |
714 |
610 |
.578 |
94 |
68 |
8 |
| Baltimore |
68 |
93 |
.422 |
782 |
869 |
.447 |
72 |
90 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| y–Chicago |
89 |
74 |
.546 |
811 |
729 |
.553 |
90 |
72 |
1 |
| Minnesota |
88 |
75 |
.54 |
829 |
745 |
.553 |
90 |
72 |
2 |
| Cleveland |
81 |
81 |
.5 |
805 |
761 |
.528 |
86 |
76 |
5 |
| Kansas City |
75 |
87 |
.463 |
691 |
781 |
.439 |
71 |
91 |
-4 |
| Detroit |
74 |
88 |
.457 |
821 |
857 |
.479 |
78 |
84 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| y–Los Angeles |
100 |
62 |
.617 |
765 |
697 |
.546 |
89 |
73 |
-11 |
| Texas |
79 |
83 |
.488 |
901 |
967 |
.465 |
75 |
87 |
-4 |
| Oakland |
75 |
86 |
.466 |
646 |
690 |
.467 |
76 |
86 |
1 |
| Seattle |
61 |
101 |
.377 |
671 |
811 |
.406 |
66 |
96 |
5 |
| National League 2008 |
| y–Philadelphia |
92 |
70 |
.568 |
799 |
680 |
.580 |
94 |
68 |
2 |
| New York |
89 |
73 |
.549 |
799 |
715 |
.555 |
90 |
72 |
1 |
| Florida |
84 |
77 |
.522 |
770 |
767 |
.502 |
81 |
81 |
-3 |
| Atlanta |
72 |
90 |
.444 |
753 |
778 |
.484 |
78 |
84 |
6 |
| Washington |
59 |
102 |
.366 |
641 |
825 |
.376 |
61 |
101 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| y–Chicago |
97 |
64 |
.602 |
855 |
671 |
.619 |
100 |
62 |
3 |
| w–Milwaukee |
90 |
72 |
.556 |
750 |
689 |
.542 |
88 |
74 |
-2 |
| Houston |
86 |
75 |
.534 |
712 |
743 |
.479 |
78 |
84 |
-8 |
| St. Louis |
86 |
76 |
.531 |
779 |
725 |
.536 |
87 |
75 |
1 |
| Cincinnati |
74 |
88 |
.457 |
704 |
800 |
.436 |
71 |
91 |
-3 |
| Pittsburgh |
67 |
95 |
.414 |
735 |
884 |
.409 |
66 |
96 |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| y–Los Angeles |
84 |
78 |
.519 |
700 |
648 |
.539 |
87 |
75 |
3 |
| Arizona |
82 |
80 |
.506 |
720 |
706 |
.510 |
83 |
79 |
1 |
| Colorado |
74 |
88 |
.457 |
747 |
822 |
.452 |
73 |
89 |
-1 |
| San Francisco |
72 |
90 |
.444 |
640 |
759 |
.416 |
67 |
95 |
-5 |
| San Diego |
63 |
99 |
.389 |
637 |
764 |
.410 |
66 |
96 |
3 |
Well, it doesn’t work. Especially AL East comes out Red Sox, Blue Jays, Rays, Yanks then Orioles. It is completely off. That would make the whole calculator worthless…. Oh, well. It was interesting idea anyways.
Here is 2007, for just a fun of it.
| American League 2007 |
| East |
W |
L |
PCT |
RS |
RA |
PYTH W% |
PYTH W |
PYTH L |
Off by: |
| Boston |
96 |
66 |
.593 |
867 |
657 |
.635 |
103 |
59 |
7 |
| New York |
94 |
68 |
.58 |
968 |
777 |
.608 |
99 |
63 |
5 |
| Toronto |
83 |
79 |
.512 |
753 |
699 |
.537 |
87 |
75 |
4 |
| Baltimore |
69 |
93 |
.426 |
756 |
868 |
.431 |
70 |
92 |
1 |
| Tampa Bay |
66 |
96 |
.407 |
782 |
944 |
.407 |
66 |
96 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cleveland |
96 |
66 |
.593 |
811 |
704 |
.570 |
92 |
70 |
-4 |
| Detroit |
88 |
74 |
.543 |
887 |
797 |
.553 |
90 |
72 |
2 |
| Minnesota |
79 |
83 |
.488 |
718 |
725 |
.495 |
80 |
82 |
1 |
| Chicago |
72 |
90 |
.444 |
693 |
839 |
.406 |
66 |
96 |
-6 |
| Kansas City |
69 |
93 |
.426 |
706 |
778 |
.452 |
73 |
89 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Los Angeles |
94 |
68 |
.58 |
822 |
731 |
.558 |
90 |
72 |
-4 |
| Seattle |
88 |
74 |
.543 |
794 |
813 |
.488 |
79 |
83 |
-9 |
| Oakland |
76 |
86 |
.469 |
741 |
758 |
.489 |
79 |
83 |
3 |
| Texas |
75 |
87 |
.463 |
816 |
844 |
.483 |
78 |
84 |
3 |
| National League 2007 |
| Philadelphia |
89 |
73 |
.549 |
892 |
821 |
.541 |
88 |
74 |
-1 |
| New York |
88 |
74 |
.543 |
804 |
750 |
.535 |
87 |
75 |
-1 |
| Atlanta |
84 |
78 |
.519 |
810 |
733 |
.550 |
89 |
73 |
5 |
| Washington |
73 |
89 |
.451 |
673 |
783 |
.425 |
69 |
93 |
-4 |
| Florida |
71 |
91 |
.438 |
790 |
891 |
.440 |
71 |
91 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chicago |
85 |
77 |
.525 |
752 |
690 |
.543 |
88 |
74 |
3 |
| Milwaukee |
83 |
79 |
.512 |
801 |
776 |
.516 |
84 |
78 |
1 |
| St. Louis |
78 |
84 |
.481 |
725 |
829 |
.433 |
70 |
92 |
-8 |
| Houston |
73 |
89 |
.451 |
723 |
813 |
.442 |
72 |
90 |
-1 |
| Cincinnati |
72 |
90 |
.444 |
783 |
853 |
.457 |
74 |
88 |
2 |
| Pittsburgh |
68 |
94 |
.42 |
724 |
846 |
.423 |
68 |
94 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Arizona |
90 |
72 |
.556 |
712 |
732 |
.486 |
79 |
83 |
-11 |
| Colorado |
90 |
73 |
.552 |
860 |
758 |
.563 |
91 |
71 |
1 |
| San Diego |
89 |
74 |
.546 |
741 |
666 |
.553 |
90 |
72 |
1 |
| Los Angeles |
82 |
80 |
.506 |
735 |
727 |
.505 |
82 |
80 |
0 |
| San Francisco |
71 |
91 |
.438 |
683 |
720 |
.474 |
77 |
85 |
6 |
This entry was posted in Baseball, Softball, and Judo. Bookmark the
permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can .
Calculating Pythagorean winning percentage for 2008
I had this kinda crazy idea of doing pythagorean flash calculator of Red Sox, Yankes and Rays for boston.com. According pythagorean expectation, a baseball team’s winning percentage is 1 divided by 1 plus runs allowed divided by runs scored square.
but for it to make sense, the 2008 numbers has to come pretty close to the actual numbers. So here is your 2008 numbers.
Well, it doesn’t work. Especially AL East comes out Red Sox, Blue Jays, Rays, Yanks then Orioles. It is completely off. That would make the whole calculator worthless…. Oh, well. It was interesting idea anyways.
Here is 2007, for just a fun of it.